Price is not a segmentation variable.
Remember from Marketing Guide #1 that markets are always people and thus market segments always consist of different groups of people.
One will sometimes see market segments being described as being “high price/mid price/low price.” This is unfortunate as price is not a people, human characteristic. Have you ever met a person whom you would describe as being a “high price person” or a “low price person”? I hope not or you’re doing something illegal. Price is not an appropriate descriptor of a person. Thus, it is not an appropriate basis for defining nor describing market segments. Pricing is a tactical marketing activity. Pricing is something the marketer does.
Admittedly, there is a consumer characteristic that is related to marketers’ price point, and that is price sensitivity. Some consumers have a high degree of price sensitivity, meaning they want low prices; while others tend to have low price sensitivity, meaning they will accept higher pricing.
If you find yourself in a situation where a marketing researcher has submitted to you a market segmentation scheme where price sensitivity is one of the segment-defining characteristics, ask the researcher what is driving price sensitivity? It has been my experience that there tend to be two drivers of price sensitivity: (1) demographics and (2) attitudes.
Demographic drivers of price sensitivity include low income. Closely correlated with low income are down-scale occupations, low educational, and age with younger consumers being less affluent than older consumers. Thus, there tends to be a series of demographic characteristics which drive price sensitivity. Note that demographics do not define market segments (review Marketing Guide #2). Wants/needs and behaviors – such as price sensitivity -- define market segments. Then demographics are used to describe the segment.
No comments:
Post a Comment